Comments on: The Patterson Film – 42 Years Later http://kengerhard.com/2009/10/20/the-patterson-film-42-years-later/ Ken Gerhard's CryptoBlog Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:56:16 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Jesus Christ http://kengerhard.com/2009/10/20/the-patterson-film-42-years-later/#comment-496 Jesus Christ Sun, 16 May 2010 09:07:02 +0000 http://kengerhard.com/?p=37#comment-496 The film that Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin made in 1967 of Bigfoot was real. The creature they filmed was half man and half gorilla. Men went to Africa a long time ago and caught female gorillas and had sex with them. If you don't believe that humans and primates can reproduce together, then watch these videos. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvVpRLvj3qs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHVFE02NTgU The film that Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin made in 1967 of Bigfoot was real. The creature they filmed was half man and half gorilla. Men went to Africa a long time ago and caught female gorillas and had sex with them. If you don’t believe that humans and primates can reproduce together, then watch these videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvVpRLvj3qs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHVFE02NTgU

]]> By: chris zaun http://kengerhard.com/2009/10/20/the-patterson-film-42-years-later/#comment-85 chris zaun Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:24:57 +0000 http://kengerhard.com/?p=37#comment-85 the 1967 roger patterson bigfoot film is of a real north american sasquatch,no one can prove this film is a fake because it is 100%real. the 1967 roger patterson bigfoot film is of a real north american sasquatch,no one can prove this film is a fake because it is 100%real.

]]> By: Andrew D. gable http://kengerhard.com/2009/10/20/the-patterson-film-42-years-later/#comment-5 Andrew D. gable Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:54:51 +0000 http://kengerhard.com/?p=37#comment-5 First off - nice enhancement. Extremely clear. Second - I hadn't realized Heuvelmans was skeptical of the PGF. Third - does it make me a bad cryptozoologist that I didn't realize yesterday was the anniversary? First off – nice enhancement. Extremely clear.

Second – I hadn’t realized Heuvelmans was skeptical of the PGF.

Third – does it make me a bad cryptozoologist that I didn’t realize yesterday was the anniversary?

]]> By: Jason Korbus http://kengerhard.com/2009/10/20/the-patterson-film-42-years-later/#comment-3 Jason Korbus Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:37:25 +0000 http://kengerhard.com/?p=37#comment-3 Aside from the Zapruder Film, has any other piece of footage been analyzed as much? It's incredible that so many years later it still hasn't been proven false but, instead, seems to only appear more real. Even if it is eventually found to be fakery, it may very well be the greatest hoax ever perpetrated. Simply fascinating! Aside from the Zapruder Film, has any other piece of footage been analyzed as much? It’s incredible that so many years later it still hasn’t been proven false but, instead, seems to only appear more real. Even if it is eventually found to be fakery, it may very well be the greatest hoax ever perpetrated. Simply fascinating!

]]> By: Carcinogen http://kengerhard.com/2009/10/20/the-patterson-film-42-years-later/#comment-2 Carcinogen Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:10:49 +0000 http://kengerhard.com/?p=37#comment-2 The Paterson tape is one of those documents that will forever be studied, scrutinized, and debated upon. Until someone captures a living specimen, or recovers a dead one, the debate will never end. I don't necessarily believe nor do I disbelieve in the authenticity of this film. The only people who know the truth behind the film are the people who shot it. The Paterson tape is one of those documents that will forever be studied, scrutinized, and debated upon. Until someone captures a living specimen, or recovers a dead one, the debate will never end. I don’t necessarily believe nor do I disbelieve in the authenticity of this film. The only people who know the truth behind the film are the people who shot it.

]]>